Efficacy and safety of the lumbosacral anatomical technique in obstetric patients

Authors

  • Zaily Fuentes Díaz Hospital Oncológico Maria Curie. Camagüey
  • Orlando Bismark Rodríguez Salazar Ministerio de Salud Pública
  • Mairelis Matamoros Proenza Ministerio de Salud Pública

Keywords:

post dural puncture headache; obstetric anesthesia; lumbosacral level; spinal anesthesia; anesthetic complications.

Abstract

Introduction: post‑dural puncture headache is a frequent complication in obstetric neuraxial anesthesia, with an internationally reported incidence ranging from 1% to 40%. In Cuba, it represents a clinical challenge that affects postpartum recovery and increases the demand for healthcare resources.

Objective: to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the lumbosacral intrathecal approach (L5‑S1) for preventing post‑dural puncture headache in obstetric patients undergoing cesarean section.

Methods: A prospective comparative analytical observational study of parallel groups was conducted with 200 patients distributed into two groups: intervention (L5‑S1 puncture) and control (L4‑L5 puncture). A 22‑gauge Whitacre needle with hyperbaric 0.5% lidocaine was used. Incidence of PDPH, anesthetic efficacy, and safety were assessed.

Results: the incidence of post‑dural puncture headache was 0% in the L5‑S1 group versus 40% in the L4‑L5 group (p<0.001). There were no differences in anesthetic efficacy between the groups. The Number Needed to Treat was 2.5.

Conclusions: the lumbosacral approach (L5‑S1) proved to be highly effective in preventing post‑dural puncture headache without compromising anesthetic efficacy, representing a safe and reproducible anatomical strategy in obstetric anesthesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zaily Fuentes Díaz, Hospital Oncológico Maria Curie. Camagüey

Doctora en Ciencias Médicas.

Especialista de I Grado en Medicina General Integral.

Especialista de II Grado en Anestesiología y Reanimación.

Profesor e Investigador Auxiliar. 

Orlando Bismark Rodríguez Salazar, Ministerio de Salud Pública

Especialista de Segundo Grado en Cirugía Plástica y Caumatología. Master en Urgencias Médicas. Doctor en Ciencias Médicas.  Profesor Titular. Hospital Universitario Manuel Ascunce Domenech, Camagüey, Cuba. 

 

Mairelis Matamoros Proenza , Ministerio de Salud Pública

Especialista de Anestesiología y Reanimación. Master en Atención Integral al Paciente Oncológico. Hospital Universitario Ginecobstétrico Ana Betancourt de Mora, Camagüey, Cuba.   

References

1. Li SL, Li MJ, Zhao YL, Wang J, Chen X. Ultrasound evaluation of dural sac termination and its correlation with post-dural puncture headache incidence in spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024;49(2):78-84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104987

2. Gupta AR, Sharma PK, Verma N, Reddy BK. Comparative study of post-dural puncture headache following spinal anesthesia at L3-L4 versus L4-L5 and L5-S1 interspaces: a randomized controlled trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023;39(Suppl 1):S22-S8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_421_22

3. Choi KJ, Park HW, Kim SY, Lee JS. Anatomical factors influencing cerebrospinal fluid leak volume: a cadaveric study of dural fiber orientation at various spinal levels. Clin Anat. 2023;36(4):567-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.24045

4. Martínez-Hurtado E, Fernández-Vázquez JM, López-Rodríguez AB, Torres-Luque LM. The lumbosacral interface as a protective zone against postdural puncture headache: a narrative review of histological and clinical evidence. Pain Ther. 2023;12(1):135-49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-022-00454-1

5. Patel RK, Williams LN, Thompson DC, Anderson MA. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of epidural fat density and distribution in relation to spinal level: implications for cerebrospinal fluid leak sealing. Spine. 2022;47(18):E612-E8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004412

6. Bernards MA, Rathmell JP, Ruppen SN, Kowalski M. Cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics at the lumbosacral junction: a computational fluid dynamics model explaining low post-dural puncture headache rates. Anesth Analg. 2022;135(6):1243-51. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006205

7. Clark BJ, Walters AS, Lin HJ, Davidson EM. Inadvertent subarachnoid puncture during attempted caudal epidural: incidence and outcomes in a large obstetric population. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022;51:103562. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103562

8. Oh ST, Lee JH, Choo MS, Park JH. A comparative anatomical study of the meningovertebral ligaments in the lower lumbar and sacral canal: potential role in dural puncture seal. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021;35(6):712-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2021.3.SPINE201896

9. García LV, Costa FM, Silva PR, Mendes FF. Does the distance from the conus medullaris influence postdural puncture headache? A prospective observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021;71(6):607-13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.024

10. Fettes NG, Johnson JPR, Smith AC, Wildman M. Update on the pathophysiology and management of post-dural puncture headache: focusing on anatomical and biomechanical perspectives. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021;34(5):576-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001041

11. Netter FH. Atlas de Anatomía Humana. 7ª ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2023.

12. Santos LC, Bezerra LR, Almeida JPG, Silva HC. Efficacy of prophylactic epidural blood patch in preventing postdural puncture headache in obstetric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2024;138(3):e18-e26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006671

13. Johnson AD, Roberts KH, Chen M, Wilson SH. Anatomical predictors of difficult neuraxial block: a prospective observational study using ultrasound imaging. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023;48(9):465-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104589

14. Kim HJ, Park SH, Lee YM, Choi SJ. Effect of needle type and gauge on the incidence of postdural puncture headache in young parturients: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Anesth. 2023;91:111253. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111253

15. Rodriguez BA, Silva MP, Costa RA, Martins RF. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their association with postdural puncture headache: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(11):2985-92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07365-x

16. Alvarez G, Perez R, Gonzalez M, Ruiz S. Incidence and risk factors for postdural puncture headache in the obstetric population: a five-year retrospective analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023;89(7-8):632-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17345-7

16. Wang T, Zhang L, Liu H, Zhou Y. Dural thickness and elasticity as potential factors in postdural puncture headache: an ultrasonographic study. Pain Physician. 2022;25(1):E109-E16.

17. Carter EB, Miller ES, Garcia M, Grobman WA. Risk factors for postdural puncture headache by delivery mode: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(2):100827. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100827

18. Lee JS, Kim DH, Park SY, Yoon SH. Comparison of postdural puncture headache between paramedian and midline approaches in spinal anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023;76(5):423-34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kja.23098

19. Fernandez A, Morales D, Jimenez L, Ramirez P. Optimal management of accidental dural puncture in obstetric anesthesia: a Delphi consensus study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2024;58:103919. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103919

20. Vargas M, Hernandez I, Castro J, Diaz R. The impact of body mass index on epidural space anatomy and postdural puncture headache risk: a computed tomography study. J Anesth. 2023;37(2):245-52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03166-8

Published

2026-03-18

How to Cite

1.
Fuentes Díaz Z, Rodríguez Salazar OB, Matamoros Proenza M. Efficacy and safety of the lumbosacral anatomical technique in obstetric patients. Rev Cub Anest Rean [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 18 [cited 2026 Mar. 21];25. Available from: https://revanestesia.sld.cu/index.php/anestRean/article/view/2317

Issue

Section

Original articles